By James B. Freeman
This monograph first offers a style of diagramming argument macrostructure, synthesizing the traditional circle and arrow strategy with the Toulmin version. A theoretical justification of this system via a dialectical knowing of argument, a serious exam of Toulmin on warrants, a radical dialogue of the linked-convergent contrast, and an account of the right kind reconstruction of enthymemes follows.
Read or Download Argument Structure:: Representation and Theory (Argumentation Library) PDF
Best rhetoric books
In lots of fictional narratives, the development of the plot exists in rigidity with a really various and robust dynamic that runs, at a hidden and deeper point, during the textual content. during this quantity, Dan Shen systematically investigates how stylistic research is imperative for uncovering this covert development via rhetorical narrative feedback.
In A now not So international Affair Andrea Slane investigates the effect of pictures of Nazism on debates approximately sexuality which are relevant to modern American political rhetoric. by way of reading an array of movies, journalism, scholarly theories, melodrama, video, and propaganda literature, Slane describes a standard rhetoric that emerged in the course of the Thirties and Nineteen Forties as a method of distinguishing “democratic sexuality” from that ascribed to Nazi Germany.
A writing instruction manual that celebrates the countless pizzazz of verbs. Writers understand it instinctively: Verbs make a sentence zing. Grammar specialists agree: Drama in writing emerges from the interaction of a subject matter (noun) and a predicate (verb). Constance Hale, the best-selling writer of Sin and Syntax, zooms in at the colourful international of verbs.
- Identity and Power in Narratives of Displacement
- La Ressemblance
- Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity
- Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority
Additional info for Argument Structure:: Representation and Theory (Argumentation Library)
The core argument presents a fact about the will to justify the claim about Judith’s share in the inheritance. How does the rest of the passage fit into the argumentation? Mental incompetence could invalidate a will. The proponent is considering an objection to his inference. But his reply that Mrs. Wilson was known competent does not, by itself, constitute evidence for the conclusion about Judith’s share in the inheritance, nor does the stated premise explain why the statement about mental competence is relevant to the claim about Judith’s share, nor does that premise need this information about mental competence to be seen relevant to the claim.
11 cf. Stevenson (1944, 123–24), from which this example was adapted. 28 1 An Approach to Argument Macrostructure Fig. 28 5 4 6 7 8 3= not-U 1 unless X presumably 2 Even if R Mrs. Wilson and her daughter had a reconciliation, the fact is that ➀ Mrs. Wilson’s will leaves all her estate to charity. Therefore ➁ her daughter has no share in her estate. Here the proponent is asking us to rethink or reconsider the positive argument in light of both the positive and negative evidence bearing on the conclusion.
Consider (1) (2) That die on toss 1 came up one. That die on toss 2 came up one. . (100) (C) That die on toss 100 came up one. Therefore it is probable that That die on the next toss will come up one. Given these one hundred premises (and assuming them acceptable), the conclusion is probable in their light. The argument has a high inductive probability. By contrast, to say that the conclusion is probable in its own right is to use the notion of epistemic probability, where that is defined as the inductive probability of a statement given the entire body of relevant knowledge.